Rockford's New Mayor, the Family Peace Center, and a Conversation Worth Having
By Thomas L. Vaultonburg
When Tom McNamara announced in July 2026 that he was stepping down as mayor of Rockford, the city's official announcement celebrated the accomplishments of his nine years in office. Among them was his role in establishing Illinois' first Family Peace Center, an institution dedicated to helping survivors of domestic violence and their families.
It was an accomplishment worth celebrating. The Family Peace Center, which opened in 2020, brought together services that had previously been scattered among different agencies. Its mission was to make it easier for survivors of abuse to obtain legal assistance, counseling, protection, and other resources without having to navigate an already difficult situation alone.
Less than two months after McNamara announced his departure, Rockford had a new mayor. Janessa Neal, formerly the city's Seventh Ward alderwoman, was selected by the City Council to serve as acting mayor until voters choose a successor in April 2027. Her appointment was historic. Neal became the first woman and first Black woman to lead Rockford.
There was, however, another part of Neal's recent history that deserves consideration alongside these accomplishments.
In February 2025, Neal, then known as Janessa Wilkins, was charged with misdemeanor domestic battery involving her teenage daughter. According to published accounts of the police investigation, the incident involved Neal striking the child with a belt. The matter was reported to authorities through a school resource officer.
On June 30, 2025, Neal pleaded guilty to misdemeanor domestic battery. Under the terms of a plea agreement, she received one year of court supervision and was required to complete anger-management classes. No judgment of conviction was entered as part of the reported agreement, and she was not sentenced to jail. Court supervision is a disposition under Illinois law that can allow a defendant to avoid a conviction upon successfully completing its conditions.
The case was not a secret. It was reported by local news organizations when the charges were filed and again when the court proceedings concluded. Neal's legal history also became a subject of public discussion when the City Council considered her appointment as mayor.
On August 10, 2026, the council selected Neal over Fifth Ward Alderwoman Gabrielle Torina by a vote of six to four, with three alderpersons abstaining. The appointment followed questions about the legal procedure for replacing a departing mayor, as well as political disagreements among council members.
Fourteenth Ward Alderman Mark Bonne, who ultimately supported Neal, acknowledged that her domestic battery case had influenced his earlier votes against her. Speaking to Rockford News First, Bonne argued that people should not be judged solely by their worst actions and noted that Neal had gone through the court process.
That is a reasonable perspective to include in any discussion of the appointment. People make mistakes, accept consequences, and work to improve their lives. The justice system itself recognizes the possibility of rehabilitation, and completing court supervision is not an insignificant matter.
But rehabilitation and public accountability are not necessarily opposing principles. A person can be entitled to move forward with their life while the public remains entitled to ask questions about the responsibilities entrusted to that person.
And in Rockford, those questions carry particular significance.
The Family Peace Center and the McNamara Legacy
The Family Peace Center was not a peripheral initiative of the McNamara administration. It was among its most visible commitments. In 2017, McNamara and the City Council created the Mayor's Office of Domestic and Community Violence Prevention. The Family Peace Center opened three years later, and its work has continued to expand.
In March 2026, McNamara appeared at a news conference announcing plans to bring specialized medical services for abused children and families into the Family Peace Center's future downtown location. Speaking to the Rock River Current, he described the expansion as a commitment to a coordinated and compassionate response to abuse. He also emphasized the importance of providing children and families with the support they deserve.
The project involves millions of dollars, numerous community partners, and a substantial investment of public and private resources. Its work should not be diminished by the political questions surrounding the mayor's office. The professionals helping survivors and vulnerable children deserve recognition for what they do.
Nevertheless, the Family Peace Center's association with the mayor's office raises an obvious question.
If addressing domestic violence is important enough to be celebrated as a defining achievement of McNamara's administration, what should the public make of his support for a successor who had recently pleaded guilty to domestic battery?
McNamara publicly endorsed Neal following her selection, expressing enthusiasm about her leadership and the historic significance of a woman becoming mayor. In the published comments reviewed for this article, he did not address her criminal case or explain how he reconciled his endorsement with his administration's longstanding commitment to domestic violence prevention.
We found no public statement from McNamara directly addressing that apparent tension. That does not establish that he has never discussed it, but it leaves a question that seems worthy of a public answer.
Why, if the Family Peace Center is an important part of McNamara's legacy, has there been no readily identifiable public explanation of his position on the domestic battery case involving the person who succeeded him?
This is not a demand that McNamara condemn Neal, nor an assertion that she should have been permanently disqualified from public office. It is simply a question about how a public commitment is understood and applied when circumstances become personally or politically complicated.
What Did Rockford Know?
One of the more interesting aspects of this story is that nearly all its individual elements were publicly reported.
Local television news covered the domestic battery charge, the court proceedings, and the City Council's selection of Neal. The Rockford Register Star reported on her guilty plea and court supervision. Rockford News First interviewed council members about the appointment, including alderpersons who acknowledged concerns about Neal's legal history.
In September, the Register Star published a letter to the editor from Olivia Carstens of Roscoe questioning what message the appointment sent to survivors of domestic violence and child abuse. Carstens also acknowledged that people should have opportunities for learning, growth, and rehabilitation.
That letter was an opinion submitted by a reader, however, rather than an independently reported investigation.
The Rock River Current covered the political maneuvering and procedural uncertainty surrounding Neal's appointment. It has also reported extensively on the Family Peace Center and McNamara's advocacy for domestic violence prevention. Our review found no substantive reporting from either the Rock River Current or the Rock River Times examining Neal's criminal case in connection with the city's domestic violence prevention commitments.
This observation is not meant to suggest that local news organizations deliberately concealed information. The individual events received coverage, and reporters have many competing demands on their time. But the distinction between reporting events separately and examining what those events mean together is an important one.
It is possible for a community to have access to information without ever having a sustained public conversation about it.
And this seems like a conversation Rockford should be capable of having.
A Question of Public Standards
Domestic battery involving a child is not identical to intimate-partner violence, and the circumstances of Neal's case should not be misrepresented. But the Family Peace Center's mission extends beyond intimate-partner violence to include the needs of children and families affected by abuse. Its planned expansion includes specialized medical services for abused children.
That makes the relationship between the criminal case and the city's institutional commitments more than a rhetorical comparison.
The question is not whether a person who has pleaded guilty to a crime must forever be excluded from public life. Nor is it whether completing court supervision should be dismissed as meaningless.
The question is what standards a community expects its leaders to apply, how those standards are communicated, and whether they remain consistent when the circumstances involve colleagues and political allies.
The City Council had the authority to consider Neal for the position, and its members made their selection. At least one alderman publicly acknowledged weighing her criminal case against the possibility of rehabilitation. Other council members emphasized her leadership qualities and ability to work with different perspectives.
Those explanations deserve to be heard.
So do the concerns of residents who believe the appointment raises questions about the city's stated priorities.
There is no need to assume bad faith on either side to recognize that these questions exist.
Rockford has invested considerable civic pride, public resources, and institutional energy in helping survivors of domestic violence. That work has real consequences for people who need assistance, sometimes at the most vulnerable moments of their lives.
The city also has a mayor who, a little more than a year before taking office, pleaded guilty to domestic battery involving her own child.
Both things are true.
The question is not whether Rockford should abandon its commitment to rehabilitation or its commitment to protecting people from abuse. A thoughtful community ought to be able to recognize the importance of both.
The question is whether its leaders are willing to explain how those commitments fit together.
And perhaps, before the next mayoral election, Rockford residents deserve an opportunity to hear that explanation.
Sources and Further Reading
Rockford Register Star. Rockford alderwoman gets court supervision in domestic battery case. June 2025.
Rockford News First / WIFR. Rockford council member charged with domestic battery after hitting teen with belt, police say. March 3, 2025.
Rockford News First / WIFR. Rockford City Council praises acting mayor selection despite legal concerns. August 2026.
Rockford News First / WIFR. Rockford residents weigh in on acting mayor decision at Politics Over Pizza. August 2026.
Rock River Current. Specialized medical team to join Family Peace Center at new location in 2027. March 2026.
City of Rockford. Official announcement concerning Mayor Tom McNamara's departure. July 2026.
Rockford Register Star. What message is being sent with Rockford mayoral appointment?. Letter to the editor by Olivia Carstens. September 2026.







