Rockford’s Symbol: Enduring Art or a Giant Red Boondoggle?
There are certain things a Rockford artist eventually learns are expected of them. Sooner or later, somebody is going to suggest a sock monkey. A screw is always available. The Rockford Peaches remain eternally on deck. And looming over all of it, quite literally, is The Symbol.
You know The Symbol. Everybody in Rockford knows The Symbol, even if quite a few people couldn't tell you what it is supposed to symbolize.
Officially titled Symbol, the enormous sculpture standing near the Rock River was created by Russian-born American sculptor Alexander Liberman, one of the major figures in 20th-century American monumental sculpture. Constructed from massive steel cylinders painted bright red, the work has become one of Rockford's most recognizable landmarks.
But Rockford's relationship with it has never been quite that simple.
When Symbol arrived in the 1970s, it immediately became something Rockford excels at producing: an argument.
To supporters, it was exactly the sort of ambitious public artwork a city like Rockford should have. Here was a monumental sculpture by an internationally recognized artist, placed prominently along the river and impossible to mistake for anything else. Rockford wasn't merely decorating a park. It was participating in contemporary art on a scale usually associated with much larger cities.
To critics, it was a collection of giant red pipes.
And expensive ones.
That disagreement has followed Symbol for decades. Depending on whom you ask, it is an important example of modern public sculpture, an enduring Rockford landmark, an incomprehensible pile of industrial tubing, or evidence that somebody somewhere had access to public money and very persuasive presentation materials.
Which may be precisely why it has succeeded.
Public art that everyone immediately agrees is pleasant tends to become invisible. A tasteful statue sits in a park. People walk past it. Nobody argues about it at the dinner table thirty years later.
Rockford has been arguing about Symbol for roughly half a century.
Liberman's work makes particular sense in an industrial city. His monumental sculptures frequently used cylinders, beams and other fabricated steel forms, transforming the vocabulary of factories and heavy industry into abstraction. In Rockford—a city whose identity was built around manufacturing, machinery and metalworking—the material doesn't exactly feel foreign.
It looks manufactured because it is.
It looks industrial because it is.
And it looks a little like somebody dropped the contents of a gigantic machine shop beside the Rock River because, well, this is Rockford.
Over time, however, something happened that neither the sculpture's defenders nor its detractors could completely control. Symbol stopped merely being a controversial piece of public art and became The Symbol.
The capitalization almost feels necessary.
It became part of the city's visual shorthand. Photograph Rockford long enough and eventually The Symbol appears. Design something intended to announce ROCKFORD and somebody will suggest putting The Symbol in it. Along with the sock monkey, the screw and the Rockford Peaches, it entered that small collection of images Rockford continually uses to explain itself to itself.
That doesn't mean everybody suddenly decided they liked it.
That's the interesting part.
A landmark doesn't necessarily require affection. It requires recognition. The Eiffel Tower was despised by prominent artists when it was built. Plenty of cities contain monuments their residents spent years mocking before eventually becoming fiercely protective of them. Familiarity does strange things to public art. Yesterday's monstrosity becomes today's landmark and tomorrow's irreplaceable piece of civic identity.
Imagine someone announcing tomorrow that The Symbol was going to be removed permanently.
People who have spent forty years calling it ugly would probably be among the first to complain.
Because after all this time, the question isn't really whether Symbol is beautiful.
The better question is whether Rockford would feel slightly less like Rockford without it.
I think it would.
And maybe that's the final verdict on the old argument about whether The Symbol was a boondoggle or enduring art.
A boondoggle disappears when the money is gone.
Art hangs around long enough for everybody to argue about what it means.
Nearly fifty years later, those giant red pipes are still standing beside the Rock River, and Rockford is still arguing.
That sounds suspiciously like art.






